How Psychology Supports Tantra and Other Traditions

"But that's not really me.  I only did that because..." and you try to explain why you did what you did. You say it's because of something in the circumstances of the situation that made you behave as you did.

In psychology, we call this the Fundamental Attribution Error.  This core psychological concept says that when we are trying to explain behaviour, we say other people did something because it is true of their personality or who they are.  When we try to explain our own behaviour, we say it is because of circumstances, or the situation we were in.

In Tantra, or Law of Attraction, or by Abraham Hicks, or by Wayne Dyer,  or a large number of spiritual traditions, there is a belief of non-duality.  We are told that there is no personal "I".  We are told that every moment, we are a different person than we were a moment ago.  We are told that every interaction we have is co-created.  So, that would mean that if you are warm a loving to one person, and hostile to another, this is the result of your beliefs and those of the other person interacting and creating what you ultimately do.  This is supported by ideas like our inability to cause a thought.  You cannot cause a thought.  They flow, and the part of you that is soul notices them.  Ego may make attributions to them, or judge the thoughts.  But we are unable to actually cause much to occur. And so Tantra tells us to accept what is and not create a separation in our experience of reality.

How does that intersect with the Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE)? What if is demonstrating what Tantra tells us? What if that is the result of the interplay between the inner consciousness observing what is (from within us), and the egoic consciousness trying to explain (backwards) why something happened? When we behave in response to circumstances, and say it is not really true of who we are, could that be evidence of a Conscious Awareness that knows it is flowing, changing, shifting and being lived (as opposed to controlling)? Could we use FAE to show that reality is just the result of our own projections?

Psychology means "study of the soul" in Latin.  When we moved into an experimental method paradigm, we focused on behaviour and less on the soul.  Wouldn't it be interesting if what we did in psychology actually ended up telling us about the soul?

Views: 64

Comment

You need to be a member of OMTimes Writer's Community to add comments!

Join OMTimes Writer's Community

OM Times Magazine is a Holistic Green eZine with a Spiritual Self-growth Perspective for the Conscious Community.

Members


Forum

October Newsletter_2019 Editorial Calendar is closed

Started by Omtimes Media. Last reply by Crystal Presence Nov 2. 1 Reply

Editor's Note September

Started by Omtimes Media. Last reply by Omtimes Media Oct 1. 3 Replies

Latest word count requirements for articles

Started by Arthur Telling. Last reply by Omtimes Media Jul 18. 3 Replies

Credibility and Reputation

Join our group of authors on Goodreads: http://ow.ly/tUyAM


Google+
Alterative Medicine Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Blogarama - Spirituality Blogs
Follow me on Blogarama

Help Support Us In Our Work and Keep OM-Times Magazine Free For All!!!




Where to find us

Google+

Contextual Links

Free Web Directory - Add Your Link

The Little Web Directory
web-ref.org

mondotimes

Find Local News Worldwide

mediaowners

Who Owns The American Media

Follow Me on Pinterest
Merchant Processing Service
web directories
Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!
PullDirectory.com - Add free links and articles.

Ciford Web Directory

alarmg4s
SubmissionMonster.com

© 2019   Created by Omtimes Media.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Omtimes writer's community